Legal Opinion

State v. Kamalski

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 14, 1981PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STIFTEL, President Judge.

The three named Respondents are before this Court on their separate motions to dismiss the State’s separate petitions to have each declared a habitual offender under Chapter 28 of Title 21 of the Delaware Code. Chapter 28 provides the machinery by which those individuals who continually disobey the motor vehicle laws of this State may have their licenses revoked for up to 5 years. 21 Del.C. § 2802 defines “habitual offender” as any person who has accumulated a certain type and number of traffic offenses within certain described time limits. Without going into further…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Stalnaker v. RobertsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  4. Villa v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. Tarr v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API