Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1990No. 90-081PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

This is an appeal from the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County. Plaintiffs, the personal representative of the deceased, Barry R. Rowe, his widow, Karen Rowe, and their two children, sought a declaratory ruling that they were entitled to recover uninsured motorist benefits under two umbrella policies issued by Travelers Indemnity Company. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The District Court denied the plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion and granted summary judgment to Travelers. From this decision, plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

The sole issue is whether the District…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moser v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Southern American Ins. Co. v. DobsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  4. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Doto v. RussoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. James M. Dickau v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Archunde v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Insurance Co. of State of Pa. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API