Legal Opinion

Cipollini v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 1994No. 3049 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Suzanne Cipollini appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s 1 decision to dismiss Cipollini’s claim petition by marking the petition “Withdrawn with Prejudice.” 2 We affirm.

The referee’s findings are summarized as follows. In September 1991, Cipollini filed a claim petition, alleging that on February 15, 1991 she suffered a work-related injury in the nature of “situational anxiety/depression” resulting in temporary total disability and permanent partial neuro-psychiatric disability. Cipollini further alleged that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Majesky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Essi International, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Fremont Farms v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Baird v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bachman Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. US Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Wagner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Northtec, LLC and American Zurich Insurance Co. v. WCAB (Skaria)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Purvis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API