Legal Opinion

Anderson-Tully Co. v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1949No. 13877PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is taken to reverse a judgment entered in an action to quiet title to certain wild, unenclosed, unimproved land suitable only for growing timber, in Lee County, Arkansas. The judgment dismissed the plaintiff’s action and quieted the title in the defendant as against all claims of the plaintiff.

The case was tried to the court without a jury under- a stipulation of facts in which the parties agreed that it should “constitute all the evidence upon which the court will adjudicate the issues presented by the pleadings’’ and it appears that the controversy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crill v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  2. Wallace v. DriverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  3. Buckner v. SuggSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Doebbeling v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. Towell v. EtterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954
  2. Kimble v. WilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951
  3. Rubin Bryant and Andrew Kennedy v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Company, a Corporation, and United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  4. Banks v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1950
  5. Ward v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API