Banks v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
LEMLEY, District Judge.
This is an action involving the title to certain Arkansas River accretions, locally termed “Quandt Island”, and situated near Arkansas Post, Arkansas. The cause was submitted on depositions, written briefs and oral argument. At the conclusion of the case the Court made the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and comment thereon.
I. Findings Of Fact
1. Plaintiffs are citizens of Arkansas; Defendant is a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the State of Delaware and is a citizen of Delaware. The amount in controversy in this case, exclusive…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Benson v. MorrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Wallace v. DriverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Banks v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1950
- Bryant v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954
- Kimble v. WilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951
- Rubin Bryant and Andrew Kennedy v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Company, a Corporation, and United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Kimble v. Anderson-Tully Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.