Legal Opinion
Lynnbrook Farms v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided March 30, 1995No. 94-1227PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [7] and Motion for Summary Judgment [15]. Pursuant to Local Rule 1.4, the Motion to Dismiss was referred to Magistrate Judge Robert J. Kauffman. While reviewing the motion, Magistrate Kauffman determined that due to the existence of the affirmative defense of federal preemption, the Motion to Dismiss should not be ruled upon until the parties had briefed the preemption issue. (Order dated October 12, 1994). The Defendants subsequently filed their Motion for Summary Judgment, which relies solely on the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lynnbrook Farms v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Murphy v. SmithKline Beecham Animal Health GroupDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Brandt v. Marshall Animal ClinicCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Garrelts v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- TDM Farms, Inc. of North Carolina v. Wilhoite Family Farm, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.