Legal Opinion

Garrelts v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided October 29, 1996No. C 95-3081-MWBPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BENNETT, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.1028

II. STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.1029

III. FINDINGS OF FACT. 1030

IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS .1032

A. Preemption Doctrine .1032

1. “Statutory” preemption. 1032

a. “Flavors” of statutory preemption.1033

b. Congressional intent.;. ...1034

e. The presumption against preemption.1034

2. “Agency” or “regulatory” preemption.. 1036

a. Source and legitimacy. 1036

b. Nature of the agency preemption inquiry.'..1036

i. The agency’s intent to preempt state law..1038

ii.…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mennen v. Easter StoresDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  2. Stanton v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1999
  3. Symens v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1997
  4. Behrens v. United Vaccines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
  5. Silvey v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API