Garrelts v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BENNETT, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.1028
II. STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.1029
III. FINDINGS OF FACT. 1030
IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS .1032
A. Preemption Doctrine .1032
1. “Statutory” preemption. 1032
a. “Flavors” of statutory preemption.1033
b. Congressional intent.;. ...1034
e. The presumption against preemption.1034
2. “Agency” or “regulatory” preemption.. 1036
a. Source and legitimacy. 1036
b. Nature of the agency preemption inquiry.'..1036
i. The agency’s intent to preempt state law..1038
ii.…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mennen v. Easter StoresDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Stanton v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1999
- Symens v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1997
- Behrens v. United Vaccines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Silvey v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.