Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Schurtz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 2008No. 3-07-0345 RelPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

In 1993, John and Lynette Schurtz entered into a marital settlement agreement, requiring John to divide his retirement benefits with Lynette. In 2004, John stopped working and began receiving disability benefits. When John refused to divide his benefits with Lynette, she filed a petition for rule to show cause and to enforce judgment. The trial court granted the petition. Lynette then filed a petition for attorney fees, which the trial court denied.

John appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay benefits to Lynette. Lynette cross-appeals, arguing that the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Regnery v. MeyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Camp v. HollisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  3. Jones v. Hryn Development, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. In Re Marriage of MichaelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. In Re Marriage of MarshallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. American States Insurance v. CFM Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Hooker v. Retirement Board of Firemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. In re Marriage of O'MalleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  4. Cunningham v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. In re Marriage of FarrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API