In Re Marriage of Michaelson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson
We are asked to determine the meaning of the maintenance provision in the parties’ marital settlement agreement. The husband, Robert L. Michaelson (Robert), agreed to pay maintenance to his wife, Anna Marie Michaelson (Anna), for eight years, totaling $360,000. The question is whether the provision provided for maintenance in gross, not subject to termination or modification on Robert’s motion. The trial court read the provision to prohibit Robert’s attempt to terminate or modify maintenance and ordered him to pay Anna’s attorney fees. We affirm the trial court.
FACTS
The parties were married…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Poeple v. Robert S.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Marriage of FreemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Marriage of Peters-FarrellIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Marriage of MorrealeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- In Re Marriage of DundasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Glazer's Distributors of Illinois, Inc. v. NWS-Illinois, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Farmers Automobile Insurance v. WroblewskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- In re Marriage of SchurtzAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- J.S.A. v. M.H.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- In Re Marriage of PondAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.