Legal Opinion

Del Rosario v. Del Rosario

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 19, 2003No. 50546-7-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

Leonida Del Rosario signed a release of personal injury claims against Gene and Priscilla Del Rosario in exchange for an insurance settlement. She later sought to avoid the release because at the time she signed it, she thought it concerned only lost wages. Ajury awarded Leonida additional damages after the trial court instructed them that a release may be avoided if it was not “fairly and knowingly made.” We hold that the trial court erred in using that standard instead of traditional contract principles. The “fairly and knowingly made” standard applies only in cases involving unknown…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Guijosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Del Rosario v. Del RosarioWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Del Rosario v. Del RosarioWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Del Rosario v. Del RosarioCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API