Legal Opinion
Del Rosario v. Del Rosario
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 2004No. 74283-9PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
97 P.3d 11 (2004)
152 Wash.2d 375
Leonida DEL ROSARIO, an individual, Respondent,
v.
Gene DEL ROSARIO and Priscilla Del Rosario, husband and wife, Appellants.
No. 74283-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued May 25, 2004.
Decided September 9, 2004.
Terry E. Lumsden, Law Offices of Terry E. Lumsden, Tacoma, Howard Mark Goodfriend, Edwards Sieh Smith & Goodfriend PS, Seattle, for appellants.
Marilee C. Erickson, Reed McClure, Seattle, David Hadley Middleton, Federal Way, for respondent.
Bryan Patrick Harnetiaux, Debra Leigh Williams Stephens, Spokane, for Amicus Curiae Wash. State Trial Lawyers…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Blaney v. International Ass'n of MacHinistsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Blaney v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. WiningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. WiningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Nishikawa v. US EAGLE HIGH, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Nishikawa v. U.S. Eagle High, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.