Zadig v. Baldwin
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The action below was originally instituted in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the county of San Francisco by the defendant in error to recover from plaintiffs in error the sum of five hundred and ninety-five dollars, with interest and costs. The complaint was in the ordinary form for money had and received, and did not otherwise indicate the the nature or character of plaintiff’s alleged cause of action. A demurrer to the complaint having- been overruled, defendants filed an answer simply denying any indebtedness to the plaintiff.
Upon the trial before the court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sayward v. DennySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ansbro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Pim v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Mutual Life Insurance v. McGrewSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Harding v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Live Oak Water Users' Ass'n v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.