Pim v. St. Louis
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COÜRT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. The'case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
This was an action for the recovery of certain real estate in the city of St. Louis of the possession of which the plaintiff' in error, who was the plaintiff below, alleged that she was illegally and wrongfully deprived by the defendants. The city denied the plaintiff's' claim, and relied upon continuous adverse possession for ten years prior to the accruing of the plaintiff’s cause of action.
We held at the present term in Chicago & Northwestern Railway v. Chicago, 164 U. S. 454, 457, as had frequently before been adjudged, that this court-could not review the final judgment of the highest…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Marchant v. Pennsylyania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Sayward v. DennySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Loeber v. SchroederSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mallett v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Disconto Gesellschaft v. UmbreitSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Miller v. Cornwall RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.