Legal Opinion
Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Triumph International Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 10, 1961PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASHIN, District Judge.
On July 15, 1960 I denied plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. 187 F.Supp. 169. Plaintiff appealed from the order denying its motion. While the case was pending before the Court of Appeals plaintiff learned of facts which, if they had been presented on the original application, plaintiff thought might have led me to a different conclusion. Application was made to the Court of Appeals for leave to renew the motion for a preliminary injunction and such leave was granted. The facts before me on the prior application, insofar as I thought them relevant, were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Triumph International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
3Cited by17 opinions
- Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Triumph International Corporation and Triumph of Europe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Ideal Toy Corporation v. Sayco Doll CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Stamicarbon, N v. V. American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Johnson v. Cyklop Strapping Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Community of Roquefort v. William Faehndrich, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.