Legal Opinion
Stamicarbon, N v. V. American Cyanamid Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 4, 1974No. 254, Docket 74-1960PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge:
James Madison probably did not suppose, on suggesting to the House of Representatives its inclusion in the Bill of Rights, 1 that the right to a public trial would one day conflict with someone’s interest in concealing a method for producing a triamino derivative of symmetrical triazine. It is not surprising then, that he gave no advice on how properly to resolve the controversy with which we are now presented. Stamicarbon, N.V. [Stamicarbon], a Netherlands corporation, appeals to us from an order denying its motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Publicker Industries, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Encyclopedia Brown Productions, Ltd. v. Home Box Office, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Standard & Poor's Corporation, Inc. v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. BrooklierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.