Legal Opinion
Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Triumph International Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASHIN, District Judge.
This is a motion for a preliminary injunction which would prevent the defendants from utilizing the word “Triumph” in the nature of a trademark or a trade name. The underlying complaint states claims grounded in trademark infringement, unfair competition and conspiracy, and requests permanent injunc-tive relief as well as an accounting for profits and damages.
The facts which I deem relevant to the motion- are not in substantial dispute. Plaintiff is a manufacturer and distributor to retail outlets in the United States, Canada, Europe and Africa of women’s hosiery.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Federal Telephone & Radio Corp. v. Federal Television Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- G. B. Kent & Sons, Ltd. v. P. Lorillard Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
3Cited by3 opinions
- Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Triumph International Corporation and Triumph of Europe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Triumph International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Diagnostic Marketing International, Inc. v. Diamed, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1989