Legal Opinion
Jorge v. Mannie (In Re Mannie)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Decided January 25, 2001No. 15-51403PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
LESLIE TCHAIKOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this adversary proceeding, plaintiff Antoinette Jorge (“Jorge”), a judgment creditor of the debtor Jack Mannie, Jr. (“Mannie”), seeks a declaration of nondis-chargeability with respect to her judgment debt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). 1 In this motion, Jorge seeks summary judgment with respect to her claim of nondis-chargeability. Defendant Mannie has filed a cross-motion for summary judgment in his favor. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant Jorge’s motion and deny Mannie’s cross-motion.
SUMMARY OF FACTS…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sill v. Sweeney (In Re Sweeney)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Bruinsma v. Wigger (In re Wigger)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018
- In re Jimmie Craig Hudson and Carla Hudson v. Julie Mincey, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Marcus Paty PerkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
- In re: Michael P. Meehan; Jonathan Fuller and Lee Fuller v. Michael P. MeehanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- In re: Robert Edward ZuckermanUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.