Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Buie

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 5, 1914No. 20954PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge; H. F. Brunot, Judge. Suit by John S. Sutton for injunction against Duncan Buie and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.

By Act No. 145, p. 259, and Act No. 297, p. 607, of 1914, the Legislature created a commission “to investigate the past and present conduct and management of the affairs of the government,” and provided for the payment of the per diem of the members of this commission and of its other expenses.

The object of the present suit is to enjoin this commission from doing its said work, and to enjoin the state auditor and the state treasurer from paying the said per diem and other expenses out of the state treasury, on the ground that the said acts are unconstitutional.

Plaintiff brings the suit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bryant v. LoganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Evans v. TillmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  4. Robertson v. TillmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Graham v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  2. Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Stewart v. StanleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. Aiken v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Dixie Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API