Pack v. Barton
Michigan Supreme Court
Quo Warranto.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley, J".
This proceeding brings in question the constitutional validity of the act of the Legislature of 1881 for the organization of the county of Montmorency, of which the respondents assume to be supervisors. The objection to the act is that it was not introduced until after the expiration of fifty days of the session, though the Constitution provides that “No new bill shall be introduced into either house of the Legislature after the first fifty days of a session shall have expired.” Art. 4, § 28, as amended in 1859-60.
The facts in the case are that within the fifty days a bill was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sears v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by15 opinions
- State ex rel. Turner v. HockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Attorney General v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Davock v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Common Council v. SchmidMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.