Lilley v. Stout
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This case arises from a disputed collaboration between the two named parties in the production of a work of art. Plaintiff Gary Lilley, a photographer, claims that photographs he produced were incorporated without proper attribution into an artwork, “Red Room at Five,” created by defendant Renee Stout. Lilley claims that Stout’s acts constituted a violation of his rights under the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (“VARA”), Pub.L. No. 101-650 (tit. VI), 104 Stat. 5089, 5128-33 (codified in various sections of Title 17 of the United States…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art Foundation, Inc. v. BüchelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008