Legal Opinion

Lilley v. Stout

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 19, 2005No. Civ.A. 02-2290(PLF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This case arises from a disputed collaboration between the two named parties in the production of a work of art. Plaintiff Gary Lilley, a photographer, claims that photographs he produced were incorporated without proper attribution into an artwork, “Red Room at Five,” created by defendant Renee Stout. Lilley claims that Stout’s acts constituted a violation of his rights under the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (“VARA”), Pub.L. No. 101-650 (tit. VI), 104 Stat. 5089, 5128-33 (codified in various sections of Title 17 of the United States…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art Foundation, Inc. v. BüchelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API