Legal Opinion
West v. Salt River Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 8, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 92-0272PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERBER, Acting Presiding Judge.
Appellant Camest West (West) sued his former employer, appellee Salt River Agricultural Improvement and Power District (SRP), alleging that SRP discriminated against him on the basis of his age by causing him to retire before he was required to do so. West appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of SRP. We conclude that as a matter of law West failed to show that he was constructively discharged and thus did not establish a pri-ma facie case of age discrimination. Therefore, we affirm the trial court.
SRP cross-appeals from the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Peterson v. SurpriseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- MacLean v. State Dept. of Educ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Mut. Ins. v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading Pa.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- KCI Restaurant Management LLC v. Holm Wright Hyde & Hays PLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Summers Group, Inc. v. Tempe Mechanical, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.