Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Fairfield-American Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1931No. 6 Div. 920PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAYRE; J.

Petitioner Fairfield-American National Bank had filed its bill in equity against J. H. Murray, Melinda Murray, John C. Hill, and Ensley Dry Cleaners, Inc., to have set aside conveyances of real and personal property as having been made in fraud of complainant, a creditor, to vacate and annul a judgment rendered in the circuit court of Jefferson, “Bessemer Division” in favor of Hill and against Murray, on the ground that the same was collusive and fraudulent, and for discovery. The bill was filed at Birmingham, but, on the plea of the Murrays, was transferred to the Fifth Division of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gay, Hardie & Co. v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Reeres & Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Stone v. Davenport Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. American Automobile Insurance Co. v. EnglishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Ex Parte Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Morton v. National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Ex Parte Walter Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API