United States v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
This action is for triple damages for alleged violation of the Elkins Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 41(3). Plaintiff United States contends Baltimore & Ohio Railroad favored General Motors Corpora* tion with a rebate of the partial cost oi defendant’s plant site and water facilities in connection with the construction of its assembly plant adjacent to tha railroad’s lines at Wilsmere, Delaware
The transaction was presented to two Federal Grand Juries under criminal provisions of the Elkins Act, once in 1951 and again in 1952. The first jury indicted B & 0 and the second returned a “no…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Shushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. GarssonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Joseph D. Nunan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- United States v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Minton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- United States v. Ben Grunstein & Sons CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
- United States v. Pennsalt Chemicals CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.