Legal Opinion

LeGrand v. Abbott Laboratories

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 11, 2024No. 3:22-cv-05815Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CONDALISA LEGRAND, Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH 8 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY ORDER 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 107, 108, 109 10 ABBOTT LABORATORIES, 11 Defendant. 12 13 The parties have three discovery disputes. ECF Nos. 107, 108 and 109. The Court rules as 14 follows. 15 A. ECF No. 107 (Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosures) 16 Abbott contends that Plaintiff’s initial disclosures do not adequately disclose Plaintiff’s 17 damages claims. Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iii) requires “a computation of each category of damages 18 claimed by the disclosing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frontline Medical Associates, Inc. v. Coventry Health CareDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  2. Security Insurance v. Trustmark InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API