Legal Opinion

Neilson v. Bowles

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 24, 1951No. 16422PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court, where plaintiff in error was defendant, and defendant in error was plaintiff.

Plaintiff, in his amended complaint, alleged that on or about March 1, 1948 he entered into an oral agreement with the defendant, by the terms of which he agreed to work for defendant and use his machinery on his farm in Saguache county, Colorado from about April 1, 1948 until the crops of defendant were harvested; that as a consideration for said work and the use of said machinery and for plaintiff’s supervision of said farming operations, until…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Indemnity Insurance v. TenerySupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  2. Baker v. Denver Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  3. Mustang Reservoir, Canal & Land Co. v. HissmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Dunbar v. McGillMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. ReuterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Buckskin Joe's, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Elizabeth Margaret Dallison and Max Dallison v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Kendall v. HargraveSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. Davis v. ClineSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  5. Polster v. Griff's of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API