Barry v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MULLIGAN, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from an order entered by District Judge Robert C. Zampano of the District Court of Connecticut on April 10, 1980, approving a consensual plan of reor*957ganization (“Compromise Plan”) for the New York, New Haven and Hartford R.R. (“New Haven” or “Debtor”). Since we find that the Compromise Plan provides for a fair and equitable distribution of the New Haven’s assets we affirm its approval. With the disposition of this appeal we trust that the proceedings involving the New Haven’s reorganization, various aspects of which have been before the Federal courts…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New Haven Inclusion CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Texaco Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc. (In Re Texaco, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Chemtura Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Quest Medical, Inc. v. ApprillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.