Legal Opinion

Peele v. Provident Fund Society

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1896No. 17,941PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

William A. Peele, Jr., about a year before his death, took out a life and accident insurance policy in favor of the appellant, his wife, in the Provi*542dent Fund Society,.one of the appellees, which risk was afterwards reinsured by the New England Mutual Accident Association, the other appellee. The complaint filed for recovery of the amount due on the policy alleges the death, by accidental drowning, of William A. Peele, Jr., on the 17th day of December, 1894, he having duly complied with all the terms and conditions of said policy of insurance. The complaint was not challenged in the court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. McNally v. Phœnix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Trippe v. Provident Fund SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Lovelace v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. BrimIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Schmid v. Indiana Travelers Accident Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Van Buren County v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Comstock v. Fraternal Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. United States Casualty Co. v. GriffisIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. People's Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API