Semple v. Hagar
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Tenth Judicial District, Colusa County. Plaintiff appealed from the judgment of the Court below dismissing the action. The other facts are stated -in the .opinion of the Court,
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Rhodes, J.
The appellant denominates this action “a bill in equity, brought to repeal and vacate a patent issued by the United States, to Thomas 0. Larkin and John S. Missroon for the Jimeno grant,” or, as he states in another portion of his brief, and which amounts to the same thing in substance, a bill “to quiet the title to the Colus grant by vacating the Jimeno grant.”
He states in his complaint that the Colus grant was granted to John Bidwell; that Bidwell conveyed the grant to the appellant; that in 1855 the title was finally confirmed to him; that the survey of the grant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Ableman v. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Mott v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Botiller v. DominguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Bacon v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Leavenworth, Lawrence & Galveston Rld. v. Comm'rs of Douglas CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Kent v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- De Bernal v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.