Legal Opinion

Parsell v. San Diego Consolidated Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1941No. Civ. No. 2809PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

In this action for personal injuries a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. A judgment notwithstanding the verdict which was then entered was reversed by this court (41 Cal. App. (2d) 382 [106 Pac. (2d) 935]), on the grounds that while it was weak there was some evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant and that *214the question of contributory negligence was one of fact rather than one of law, with the suggestion that a new trial could properly be granted. After the going down of the remittitur the defendant presented its motion for a new trial which the court, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cordiner v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
  2. Armstrong v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Oliveira v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Parsell v. San Diego Consolidated Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ostertag v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Paxton v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. McNulty v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Lemere v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API