State v. Stapp
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marion District Oourt. Wednesday, October 5. Indictment for keeping a nuisance ; plea, not guilty ; verdict, guilty; judgment on the verdict, and defendant appeals. The facts necessary to an understanding of the case appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The indictment charges that the defendant, “ at the county of Marion, and state of Iowa, on the 1st day of January, 1869, unlawfully did use a certain building then and there situate, and under the control of him, the said H. T. Stapp, for the purpose of keeping intoxicating liquor, to wit, rum, gin, brandy, whisky, wine and bitters therein, with intent to sell the same, and in said building, in said county and state, did unlawfully sell said liquors,” etc., etc.,
*552On the trial, the state called a witness who testified as follows : “ Sometime in the month of February, 1869, I was in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The Marianna FloraSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- State v. BarkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
- McVey v. BlairIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crawford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Melzner v. Raven Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. KendigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- State v. MahanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.