Bell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
In this case the appellant was prosecuted for pursuing the occupation of selling intoxicating liquor in Camp County, local option being in force in said county. Hpon a trial he was convicted, and his punishment assessed at three years confinement in the penitentiary.
The only assignment of error is th^t “the verdict and judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence.” The indictment is in accordance with the form approved by this court in Mizell v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 226, 128 S. W. Rep., 125. Local option is shown to be in full force in said county; a number of sales…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Crocket v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- State v. AbbeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
- Williams v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. RosascoOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Howes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Knowling v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.