State v. Mahan
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Qlinton District Court. — Hon. W. F. BraNítah, Judge. The defendant was indicted for the crime of adultery. A demurrer to the indictment was sustained; and the state appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobihsoN, J.
The body of the indictment is in words as follows: “ The grand jury of the county *122of Clinton, in the name and by the authority of the state of Iowa, upon complaint made and prosecution commenced,'by Arthur E. Bicknell, husband of Grace E. Bicknell, accused J. L. Mahan of the crime of adultery committed as follows: The said J. L. Mahan, on the fifteenth day of April, A. D. 1888, in the county aforesaid, did, wilfully and feloniously, have sexual intercourse with Grace E. Bicknell, a married woman, who was not his wife, the said Grace E. Bicknell being then and there a married woman, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DonovanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- State v. HenkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- State v. RothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- State v. StappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- State v. StevensonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- State v. WakefieldOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. MaasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.