Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. Mobil Exploration and Producing, North America, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 26, 1996No. 94-C-1078-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

SAM, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The court has before it the motion for summary judgment of defendants Mobil Exploration and Producing, North America, Inc., (“MEPNA”) and Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S., Inc. (“MEPUS”). By their motion, defendants seek the court’s judgment that as a matter of law the State of Colorado’s workers’ compensation statutes apply in determining the rights of plaintiff to file a tort liability claim against defendants and, that under Colorado law, plaintiff cannot recover against defendants because of the exclusive remedy provision of Colorado’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Armijo v. Ex Cam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Finlay v. Storage Technology Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Cincinnati Insurance v. AMSCO WindowsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2013
  3. Rupp v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API