Legal Opinion

Gozzo v. Anglin

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 15, 1991No. 89-P-1270PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Under G. L. c. 218, § 24, and Rule 4 of the Uniform Small Claims Rules (1983), as interpreted in Daum v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 396 Mass. 1013 (1986), the defendant was entitled to allowance of his motion to transfer this small claims case to the regular District Court docket. “[A] judge should rarely, if ever, exercise his discretion to prevent removal.” Id. at 1014. In view of that strict standard for denial of a request for transfer to the regular docket, the judge should indicate why it is that the case falls into the exceptional category of those as to which removal may be denied. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daum v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Lyons v. Kinney System, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boat Maintenance & Repair Co. v. LawsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. D.R. Peck Excavating, Inc. v. MachadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API