D.R. Peck Excavating, Inc. v. Machado
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
RESCRIPT
If DRPE wished to preserve its regular appellate rights (and other incidents of the regular civil process), it had an avenue by which to do so. Before the case was tried initially to the clerk-magistrate, it could have requested that the case be transferred out of the small claims session and onto the regular civil docket. G. L. c. 218, § 24. Rule 4(a) of the Uniform Small Claims Rules (2009). See Perlin & Connors, supra at § 15.36. We have consistently held that a defendant who fails to take that step has no right later to obtain review under G. L. c. 211, § 3, to replace the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Avery v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- McMenimen v. PassatempoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Daum v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Trust Insurance v. Bruce at Park Chiropractic ClinicMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Skandha v. Clerk of the Superior Court for Civil Business in Suffolk CountyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JACK KRIMKOWITZ v. SERGUEI ALIEV.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Mullane v. Barclays Bank Del.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Mullane v. Barclays Bank DelawareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019