Legal Opinion

Zeitz v. Mara

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1939No. Docket Nos. 88, 89, Calendar Nos. 40,560, 40,561PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiffs, whose actions were consolidated for trial, appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury of no cause of action in favor of defendants and the refusal of the court to grant plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. On July 16, 1937, plaintiff Albert R. Zeitz,- Jr., then 19 years of age, drove a car owned by his father, plaintiff Albert R. Zeitz, Sr., with his consent, from Highland Park to Lakeville for the purpose of going swimming with some young people who accompanied him. While there they met defendant Albert R. Mara and some others whom they had previously known. About…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. PierceMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. People v. KasemMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. EngleMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Pulford v. MouwMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. People v. De MeauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. PizzinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Dahn v. SheetsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. MaloneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Godfrey v. HemenwayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Decker v. SchumacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API