Legal Opinion
Claim of Kinney v. Prudential Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 30, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Crew III, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 28, 1998, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related disability and denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.
In September 1994, claimant was hired by the employer to sell insurance and other financial products. This position required claimant to obtain licenses from the State Insurance *782Department and the National Association of Securities Dealers (hereinafter NASD), and the applications for both licenses, in turn, required claimant to disclose any criminal convictions. In this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- DePaoli v. Great a & P Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Claim of DePaoli v. Great A & P Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Dockum v. Syroco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Bottieri v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Veeder v. New York State Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Sakanovic v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Claim of Brittain v. New York State Insurance DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Brittain v. New York State Insurance DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013