Legal Opinion

Claim of Dockum v. Syroco, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 28, 1997, which ruled that claimant did not suffer a compensable injury and denied workers’ compensation benefits.

On July 29, 1994 claimant, an electrician, was instructed by his supervisor, John Perry, to diagram an electrical panel that claimant originally had built and installed. Later that day, Perry discovered that claimant had physically altered the panel and advised claimant to reassemble the panel as it needed to be operational by the end of the workday. When Perry next checked on claimant’s progress, he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Friedman v. NBC Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Claim of DePaoli v. Great A & P Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DePaoli v. Great a & P Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Claim of Kinney v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Claim of Veeder v. New York State Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Matter of Sakanovic v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  5. Matter of Anderson v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API