Legal Opinion
Claim of Veeder v. New York State Police Department
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 14, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peters, J.E
Decedent had been employed as a forensic scientist for approximately 31 years by the employer. In April 2008, the forensic lab where decedent worked underwent a reaccreditation process, during the course of which an audit uncovered an inconsistency in the fiber proficiency tests that were regularly performed by decedent. An investigation into the issue was commenced by the employer and, over the course of three days, several meetings were held between decedent and his supervisors to discuss the inconsistencies in the test results. After decedent advised his supervisors that he had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- DePaoli v. Great a & P Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Claim of Charlotten v. New York State PoliceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Ford v. Unity House of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Martin v. Fulton City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Meyers v. Teachers CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Brittain v. New York State Insurance DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Brittain v. New York State Insurance DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Veeder v. New York State Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Veeder v. New York State Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013