Legal Opinion
IMC Chemicals, Inc. v. Niro, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 23, 1998No. Civil Action 98-2348 KHVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
IMC Chemicals, Inc. filed a three-count complaint against Niro, Inc., asserting contract and tort claims which arise from Niro’s agreement to develop and install fluid bed dryers for IMC’s mineral manufacturing facility in California. Niro in turn filed a three-count third-party complaint alleging breach of contract and seeking indemnification from DEC International, Inc., which contracted with Niro to fabricate tube bundles for the bed dryers, under contract and tort theories of recovery. This matter comes before the Court on Niro’s Motion For…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Gff Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Coach Works of Virginia v. Detroit Diesel Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Eaton v. MeneleyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002