Eaton v. Meneley
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring these actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants, acting under color of state law, deprived them of constitutionally protected rights of freedom of association, due process and privacy. In addition, plaintiffs assert a state law claim for invasion of privacy. These matters come before the Court on Defendant David Meneley’s Motion To Dismiss On The Basis Of Qualified Immunity And F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) Failure To State A Claim (Doc. # 17 in Eaton v. Meneley, et al., Case No. 01-2097-KHV and Doc. # 11 in Price, et al. v.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sheets v. CTS Wireless Components, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2002