Legal Opinion
Burgess v. Bell
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 26, 2008No. Case 07-11367PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING THE RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ANSWER AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Through counsel, the petitioner, Arthur Burgess, a state prisoner confined at the Chippewa Correctional Facility in Kinche-loe, Michigan, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He challenges his 1977 conviction for one count of first-degree murder and two counts of second-degree murder. His petition was received for filing on March 29, 2007. On August 7, 2007, Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen entered an order pursuant to Rule 5…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Theresa E. Foster v. William A. HalterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dansby v. MaCauleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Odom v. MorrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Wright v. ShaverDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022