Legal Opinion

Dansby v. MaCauley

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 22, 2025No. 2:23-cv-13006Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DMARQUE DRIAUN DANSBY, Petitioner, Case No. 23-13006 Honorable Laurie J. Michelson v. MATT MACAULEY, Respondent. ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER TO THE AMENDED HABEAS PETITION [17, 18] AND DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT [15] Dmarque Driaun Dansby filed a pro se Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus with this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dansby subsequently moved to hold the case in abeyance to return to the state courts to exhaust additional claims. On April…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Erwin v. EloDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  3. Wilkerson v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  4. Burgess v. BellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API