Dr. Jack L. Marvin, Patricia Marvin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAGG, Circuit Judge.
The Marvins seek return of records concerning Dr. Marvin’s chiropractic practice which were seized by Internal Revenue Service agents in the course of a criminal tax investigation. The district court denied their motion brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e). We have been informed that all of the original records have been returned to the Marvins, but that the IRS has retained copies of documents reflecting financial information. Hence, the question before us is whether the IRS may retain these copies. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Kenneth…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. Richard J. Leary, and F.L. Kleinberg & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. J. Clenton Henson (87-5132) Sheila Henson Lutz (87-5138) & C. Alan Henson (87-5144)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Arvle Edgar MedlinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. James Purdy Lambert (84-5660) Philip M. Block (84-5661), DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.