Legal Opinion
United States v. James Purdy Lambert (84-5660) Philip M. Block (84-5661), Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 16, 1985No. 84-5660, 84-5661PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants James Lambert and Phillip Block entered conditional pleas of guilty in the District Court, pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 11(a)(2), to single counts of their respective indictments charging conspiracy and distribution of controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. In their conditional pleas, the defendants reserved the right to appeal from the District Court’s denial of their pretrial motions to suppress evidence obtained by the government through electronic wiretapping, the execution of a search warrant and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Russell Marcilis, II v. Township of RedfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) and Charles R. Morse, (88-5942)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Lee Erwin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. J. Clenton Henson (87-5132) Sheila Henson Lutz (87-5138) & C. Alan Henson (87-5144)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.