Legal Opinion
Schmitt v. Cape George Sewer District No. 1
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 23, 1991No. 13542-6-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
Jean and William Schmitt and Lili and Milton Foss appeal a judgment of the Jefferson County Superior Court declaring that a Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) was validly created. They contend on appeal that the trial court erred in concluding that commissioners of the Cape George Sewer District (1) had the power to exclude from their calculations certain land within the boundaries of a proposed ULID when determining the sufficiency of the petition to create the ULID; and (2) did not violate the Open Public Meetings Act of 1971. We reverse.
*3The facts are not in dispute. The Schmitts and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. State Personnel BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.