Ratcliff v. Mattinson

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 EVAN RATCLIFF, 9 Case No.: 2:19-cv-01275-GMN-NJK Plaintiff(s), 10 ORDER v. 11 [Docket No. 52] SCOTT MATTINSON, et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 14 Pending before the Court is a partial motion for reconsideration filed by Defendants 15 Jennifer Nash, Michael Minev, and Benedicto Gutierrez’s (“Defendants”).1 Docket No. 52. The 16 Court has considered Defendants’ motion, Plaintiff’s response, and Defendants’ reply. Docket 17 Nos. 52, 53, 55. The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the 18 reasons…