Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Wallowa County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 21, 2003No. Nos. 01-35709, 01-35710PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WALLACE; Concurrence by Judge TASHIMA.
OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dixon appeals from Fourth Amendment and Due Process summary judgments and a judgment after jury trial in her 42 U.S.C. ■ § 1983 claims against Wallowa County (County) and certain county officers. The two individual defendants cross-appeal, asserting errors in three summary judgment rulings. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § § 1331 and 1343. We have jurisdiction over this timely filed appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
On June 7, 1998, state police officers arrested…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Cox v. Maine State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Syncor Erisa Litigation v. Cardinal Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.