Legal Opinion

Tucson National Bank v. Gomez

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1925No. Civil No. 2237PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— Charles Gomez and Delfina Gomez, his wife, hereinafter called appellees, were the owners of certain real estate in Tucson, Arizona. They entered into a contract with one J. C. McQuaid to erect a dwelling thereon, which contract contained the following clause:

“And the said party of the first part agrees to pay or cause to be paid the cost of all materials and labor used in and about the construction of said dwelling-house and building, and to keep the same at all times free from mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens on account of the furnishing of any such labor or materials. ’ ’

McQuaid erected…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ancient Order of Hibernians v. SparrowMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Dowdy v. CalviArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Empire State Surety Co. v. LindenmeierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  5. Friend v. RalstonWashington Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. De Wulf v. BissellArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Siwooganock Guaranty Savings Bank v. CushmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  3. Boone v. MaloneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API