Ex Parte Bowers
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, Justice.
Before an opinion issued in this case, a majority of this Court called for an en banc review1 concerning the analysis of the fifth *348amendment violation. See Tex.R.App.P. 79(d), 100(f).
This is an original habeas corpus proceeding. Relator, Gideon Mark Bowers, contends that his confinement for contempt is illegal because he did not receive notice of the permanent injunction he was charged with violating. He also alleges that the trial court (1) had no jurisdiction over him, and (2) by the manner and means in which it conducted the hearing on the motion for contempt,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Ex Parte WerbludTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Mapco, Inc. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Ex Parte BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Douglas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Yilmaz v. McGregor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Carroll v. Humsi, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Carreras v. Zamora, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.